office@casecon.com

Search
Close this search box.

+44 (0) 20 7376 4418

Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Competition Litigation and Damages Economists

Specialists in providing expert economic evidence in antitrust, competition damages and collective actions

Practice Areas

Casenotes

The one (h)armed economist in the CAT – The CAT’s new expert rules

The CAT is fed up with the way economists are giving evidence. It has criticised economists for putting their independence at risk by promoting the commercial interests of their clients, and exchanging lengthy and complex reports that have become unmanageable, wasteful and overburdening the Tribunal. It has issued two new Practice Directions on expert evidence. Our December Casenote looks at what has happened, the reasons, and the proposed solutions in the new expert rules.

Read More »

News

Sports antitrust in the CAT

The organisation of snooker is under scrutiny for the second time in the English courts. NST Worldwide v World Snooker & WPSBA has been filed in the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal by an entrant alleging that the organiser of the World Snooker Tour and the sport’s governing have singly and jointly acted to restrict players’ freedom to play in tournaments organised by competitive
promoters. This case is a re-run of the 2001 High Court antitrust case Hendry v WPSBA (largely overlooked), where the WPSBA was found to have abused its dominance. Cento was then and is now the economist expert witness for the respective claimants. On the earlier case read his re-posted Casenote and ECLR article “Markets in Professional Sport”.

Copyright @ CASE Associates 1995-2026